Prediction of Mitchell Krueger [141st] vs Patrick Maloney [364th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L W W L W L W
Form
W W L L W L W W W LH2H: Krueger 0 - 0 Maloney
| Krueger | Stats | Maloney |
|---|---|---|
| 47% (9-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 74% (20-7) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 141 | Ranking | 364 |
| 135 | Highest Rank | 364 |
| 31 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 9 | Titles | 3 |
| 53% (432-385) | Career Total W/L | 65% (89-47) |
| $1,082,108 | Career Prize Money | $3,650 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 2 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mitchell Krueger vs Patrick Maloney Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Krueger 0 - 0 Maloney
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Krueger has won 48.16% of points on their second serve, while Maloney has won 43.73%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Krueger, in recent form, has won 47.99% of their opponent's second serve points, while Maloney has won 46.21%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.01% and 28.41% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Krueger has saved 54.92% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Maloney has saved 54.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Krueger has won 54.41% of matches played (W/L 37/ 31), with Maloney winning 66.67% (W/L 48/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Krueger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 119/ 92), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 9/ 15). Maloney has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 69% (W/L 35/ 16), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 28/ 18).
- Player level: In the last year, Krueger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.78% of matches (W/L 19/ 17), where as Maloney has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 33/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Krueger has played against opponents with an average rank of 227.53 while Maloney has played against players with an average rank of 206.08.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Krueger has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Maloney has won 80% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Krueger has converted 35.77% of breakpoint opportunities, and Maloney has converted 31.87% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Mitchell Krueger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Facundo Mena
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
46%
(
38 of
82)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Mitchell Krueger
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Joel Schwaerzler
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kei Nishikori
Player
Mitchell Krueger
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Patrick Zahraj
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
68
|
6-7(5) 5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Toby Alex Kodat
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
55
Total Points Won
55
|
5-7 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Mitchell Krueger
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Mitchell Krueger
70%
(
65 of
93)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
4
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
100
Total Points Won
86
|
5-7 7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Mitchell Krueger
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Mitchell Krueger
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Patrick Maloney Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Patrick Maloney
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
6
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
9
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
65
|
4-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Martin Damm
68%
(
62 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
60 of
105)
2
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
7
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
35 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
105)
99
Total Points Won
97
|
1-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Corentin Denolly
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Sebastian Gima
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Patrick Maloney
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Andres Andrade
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
80)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
73
Total Points Won
69
|
6-7(5) 5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Darwin Blanch
Player
Patrick Maloney
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve %
35%
(
12 of
34)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
35%
(
12 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
42
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Patrick Maloney
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
79)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
25%
(
4 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Daniel Milavsky
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
6
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Krueger vs Maloney?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Krueger Vs Maloney is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (432/385) | Win/Loss | 65% (89/47) |
| 53% (1020/905) | Sets Win/Loss | 62% (194/121) |
| 51% (9418/8988) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (1605/1360) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.38 |
| 2809 | Aces Total | 545 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 1644 | Total Double Faults | 353 |
| 1:22:39 | Average Match Time | 1:34:20 |
| 196.44 | Average Opponent Rank | 180.67 |
| 62% (29044/47103) | 1st Serve % | 65% (5364/8289) |
| 69% (20087/29044) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (3714/5364) |
| 51% (9177/18059) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1426/2925) |
| 41% (1773/4288) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (370/852) |
| 38% (18216/47497) | Return Points Win % | 41% (3424/8393) |
| 53% (421/800) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (87/134) |
| 55% (6/11) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (127/274) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (20/36) |
| 45% (126/282) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (27/45) |
| 81% (441/358) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (92/77) |
| 19% (441/83) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (92/15) |
| 19% (376/70) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (44/11) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
